Comments on: Scientific writings http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/ Kyle Rove's Weblog Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:38:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: Kyle http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-84 Kyle Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:21:59 +0000 http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-84 I'll have to check out Texshop! Thanks for the tip. :-) I've played around with the Latex Equation Editor, but still haven't quite learned enough syntax to fully describe some of the equations that I see on a regular basis. I’ll have to check out Texshop! Thanks for the tip. :-)

I’ve played around with the Latex Equation Editor, but still haven’t quite learned enough syntax to fully describe some of the equations that I see on a regular basis.

]]> By: Joshua http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-82 Joshua Sun, 26 Sep 2004 23:56:47 +0000 http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-82 Personally I use Texshop on OS X for doing any sort of scientific writing. It takes some getting use to but you can pick up the 'arcane' syntax and get good at writing it pretty fast. I find it much faster than using microsoft equation editor. Another option that I haven't used much is <a href="http://evolve.lse.ac.uk/software/EquationEditor/">Latex Equation Editor</a> which you can use to export just the equations as .pdf files and save commonly used equations in a library. Personally I use Texshop on OS X for doing any sort of scientific writing. It takes some getting use to but you can pick up the ‘arcane’ syntax and get good at writing it pretty fast. I find it much faster than using microsoft equation editor. Another option that I haven’t used much is Latex Equation Editor which you can use to export just the equations as .pdf files and save commonly used equations in a library.

]]> By: Sean Casey http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-78 Sean Casey Fri, 24 Sep 2004 03:10:52 +0000 http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-78 No need for the scarlet psi, I think, Kyle. Although it might be an interesting Halloween costume (you could be "Hector Priam" - ok, they're both Trojans, I know, but you get my point. This might just be a little too geeky (greeky?) for most, though.) No need for the scarlet psi, I think, Kyle. Although it might be an interesting Halloween costume (you could be “Hector Priam” – ok, they’re both Trojans, I know, but you get my point. This might just be a little too geeky (greeky?) for most, though.)

]]> By: Kyle http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-77 Kyle Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:56:07 +0000 http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-77 My level of perfection must be faltering. (Fluorescnet?!?!) I have fixed the equation in the post. Thanks for noticing that, Dr. Casey. Maybe I should wear a big greek <em>PSI</em> around my neck like Hester Prynn's <em>A</em> to publicly humiliate me for that egregious error. My level of perfection must be faltering. (Fluorescnet?)

I have fixed the equation in the post. Thanks for noticing that, Dr. Casey.

Maybe I should wear a big greek PSI around my neck like Hester Prynn’s A to publicly humiliate me for that egregious error.

]]> By: Sean Casey http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-76 Sean Casey Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:39:26 +0000 http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2004/09/21/scientific-writings/#comment-76 Kyle: You should probably square that wavefunction for that equation to be true, don't you think? Sean Kyle:
You should probably square that wavefunction for that equation to be true, don’t you think?
Sean

]]>